Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bornacatholic
My point is that people change over time, Reagan did.

Do you really think that GW Bush wants his legacy to be that he appointed another souter.

24 posted on 10/22/2005 5:18:03 AM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Dane
the question was about knowledge of Miers vs knowledge about Reagan. We know Reagan changed. We don't know enough about Meirs to establish she has any ideas of firmly-setled,unyielding, conservative principles or that she has repudiated liberal principles she once held.

There is too much that is unknown and therefore her credentials do not meet the criteria established by Bush's own promises.

Bush too, like Reagan, could have changed; only for the worse.

I desire some objective, measureable, verifiable, conservative criteria not some vague "trust me" words.

Mr. Bush, tear down this wall of uncertainty.

JRB, baby.

28 posted on 10/22/2005 5:43:16 AM PDT by bornacatholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Dane

Bush is the one who claimed that Miers would not change over time, and would be the same person 20 years from now as she is today.


52 posted on 10/23/2005 2:17:11 AM PDT by ellery (The true danger is when liberty is nibbled away, for expedience, and by parts. - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson