[FairOpinion]

Yes, we know. Those who vote to cut spending are the "corrupted conservatives".

The "REAL conservatives" are the ones who promote and vote for the Democrats agenda, as in against Prop. 76.

(/sarcasm)

[calcowgirl]

Yes, we know. Those who vote to cut spending are the "corrupted conservatives".

Who is talking about "cuts"? Certainly NOT the Yes on Prop 76 campaign!

From today's San Francisco Chronicle:

But Campbell said he has looked forward starting in 2006, which is when the measure would take effect, and doesn't believe that the cap would have an impact on state spending until 2013.

"That's because we start with three good years of revenue behind us," he said. "It completely depends on what year you start."

Not to mention 2 years of record spending inflated by Prop 57/58 borrowing. Like I said HERE:

Given recent history, this means the spending level (inflated by borrowing) and the revenue (inflated by one time increases) will be used as a basis to “limit” future spending. They are taking the best-of-the-best and presenting it as a fiscally responsible basis for “limiting” future expenses. What is responsible about using the highest revenues and the highest expenditures of all time as a basis to establish a "cap" for limiting future expenditures?

[SierraWasp]

Being silly like that will NOT git my goat! The only way you'll ever git my goat is to find out where I tied it!!!