To: calcowgirl
That would be the ones that authorized transportation funds, right? These same business groups want to make it easier to raise parcel taxes on property in the future. Let's see: they don't mind tax protections for themselves but they want the little guy to pay through the nose for their pet projects. If we have borrowing, its inevitable we'll have tax increases down the road. It all has be paid for and it won't paid for through spending cuts.
("Denny Crane: Gun Control? For Communists. She's a liberal. Can't hunt.")
27 posted on
10/21/2005 10:33:31 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
That would be the ones that authorized transportation funds, right? That would be all of the funds that are to be recharacterized as one-time obligations under Proposition 76 and spread over 15 years (transportation, education, etc). This was the last tally I started.
It all has be paid for and it won't paid for through spending cuts.
Not unless they are forced to do so. Approving more borrowing certainly won't help.
28 posted on
10/21/2005 11:26:49 PM PDT by
calcowgirl
(CA Special Election: Yes, Yes, Yes, No, No, No, No, No!)
To: goldstategop
I love Denny Crane. Loved the last episode when he came in dressed like a minute man. Freakin classic.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson