Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: calcowgirl
That would be the ones that authorized transportation funds, right? These same business groups want to make it easier to raise parcel taxes on property in the future. Let's see: they don't mind tax protections for themselves but they want the little guy to pay through the nose for their pet projects. If we have borrowing, its inevitable we'll have tax increases down the road. It all has be paid for and it won't paid for through spending cuts.

("Denny Crane: Gun Control? For Communists. She's a liberal. Can't hunt.")

27 posted on 10/21/2005 10:33:31 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: goldstategop
That would be the ones that authorized transportation funds, right?

That would be all of the funds that are to be recharacterized as one-time obligations under Proposition 76 and spread over 15 years (transportation, education, etc). This was the last tally I started.

It all has be paid for and it won't paid for through spending cuts.

Not unless they are forced to do so. Approving more borrowing certainly won't help.

28 posted on 10/21/2005 11:26:49 PM PDT by calcowgirl (CA Special Election: Yes, Yes, Yes, No, No, No, No, No!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: goldstategop

I love Denny Crane. Loved the last episode when he came in dressed like a minute man. Freakin classic.


30 posted on 10/21/2005 11:28:14 PM PDT by lndrvr1972
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson