Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: etlib
PROP	Desc                                                  ARNIE	MCCLINTOCK	SHKN SURVEY
73	Teen abort waiting period.............................YES.......YES.............PICK
74	Pub school Teachers Waiting Period....................YES.......YES.............PICK
75	Pub Employee Union Dues Pol Contribs..................YES.......YES.............WINNING
76	State spending limits.................................YES.......YES.............LOSING
77	Redistricting.........................................YES.......YES.............PICK
78	Prescrip Drug Discounts (initiative statute)..........YES.......NO..............WINNING
79	Prescrip Drug Discounts (state-negotiated rebates)....NO........NO..............LOSING
80	Regulation of Electric Service Providers..............NO........NO..............LOSING

2 posted on 10/21/2005 11:22:41 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: martin_fierro
The Reason Foundation's analysis of Prop 76

Pete Wilson's budget director warns about 76

My analysis of the Legislative Analyst Office's opinion on the consequences of Prop 76

6 posted on 10/21/2005 11:51:28 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: martin_fierro
I thought we were in better shape than that. Very unsettling.

Time to donate to Arnold's effort if you feel so inclined.

McClintock's got pro-prop 75 and 76 ads running on talk radio.

7 posted on 10/21/2005 11:52:29 AM PDT by newzjunkey (CA: Stop union theft for political agendas with YES on Prop 75! Prolife? YES on Prop 73!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: martin_fierro

The SHKN Survey is hokie (as was the SurveyUSA poll).

The SHKN survey showed Prop 79 (the Dem/Union backed pharma measure) winning, not losing,
with more Republicans (62%) supporting it than Democrats (54%).
It does not compute.

http://www.knowledgenetworks.com/ganp/docs/appendix%20to%2010-17-2005%20Hoover-KN%20press%20release%20V2.pdf



8 posted on 10/21/2005 12:17:22 PM PDT by calcowgirl (CA Special Election: Yes, Yes, Yes, No, No, No, No, No!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: martin_fierro

This explains why Tom is recommending the votes yes or no on specific issues.

Voting recommendations from Tom McClintock

#73 – YES
#74 – YES
#75 – YES
#76 – YES
#77 – YES
#78 – NO
#79 – NO
#80 – NO

Proposition 73: Parental Notification for Abortion. If parental consent is required for a child to use a tanning booth or get her ears pierced, shouldn’t parents at least be notified if she’s getting an abortion? YES. Whether you’re pro-life or pro-choice, this should be the all-time no-brainer.

Proposition 74: Teacher Tenure. Do parents have a right to expect a higher level of competence before a teacher is granted life-time tenure? YES. This modest measure simply increases the teacher probation period from two years to five years.

Proposition 75: Public Employee Union Dues. Should public employees decide for themselves which candidates they will support with their own money? YES. This measure requires that before a public employee union can take money from that employee for political donations, it has to get the employee’s permission.

Proposition 76: State Spending. Should government live within its means? YES. This measure restores the authority that the governor of California had between 1939 and 1983 to make mid-year spending cuts whenever spending outpaces revenue without having to return to the legislature.

Proposition 77: Re-districting. Should voters choose their representatives in legislative districts that are drawn without regard to partisan advantage? YES. The most obvious conflict of interest in government is when politicians choose which voters will get to vote for them by drawing their own legislative district lines. This measure puts a stop to it.

Propositions 78 and 79: Prescription drug discounts. Do you want the same people who run the DMV to run your pharmacy? NO. These are rival measures, one supported by drug companies and the other by liberal activists – both of which purport to lower drug prices. What they really do is assure that one group of patients gets to pay higher prices to provide subsidized prices for others. There’s no such thing as a free Levitra.

Proposition 80. Electricity Regulation. Do you want the same people who run the DMV to run your electricity company? NO. This measure locks in monopoly control of your electricity by the bureaucratized utilities and forbids you from ever being able to shop around for the lowest-priced electricity available.


11 posted on 10/21/2005 1:09:46 PM PDT by CyberAnt (I BELIEVE CONGRESSMAN WELDON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson