"It has no ability to develop new knowledge through hypothesis testing, modification of the original theory based on experimental results and renewed testing through more refined experiments that yield still more refinements and insights,"
And how does Darwinism fit into this? There are no experiments to conduct, there is no renewed testing...there is no test of Darwinism. There is a collection of historical evidence in the fossil record, and there is evidence in biology etc. Intelligent Design looks at the same record of evidence and comes to a different conclusion than Darwinism. There is just as much science in developing the theory of Intelligent Design as there is for Darwinism. Darwinists believe the weight of the evidence points to chance and natural selection, ID folks think otherwise.
Rawlings is an idiot...but what do you expect from Ithaca?
Biology labs "evolve" life every day. Where have you been?
Intelligent Design looks at the same record of evidence and comes to a different conclusion than Darwinism.
ID attempts to find fault with evolution, and then claims that these faults are evidence of God. Balony. If the highly unlikely situation occured that all the multiple lines of evidence for evolution were blown away, that's not a reason to believe in the supernatural. Some other unknown natural process could have been the cause of species.
Item |
Evolution |
ID |
fizziwig |
Common Descent |
Common Descent |
Common Descent |
Supports ID? |
Age of Earth |
Earth is billions of years old |
Earth is billions of years old |
Supports ID? |
Age of Man |
Man evolved over millions of years |
Man evolved over millions of years |
Supports ID? |
God |
Do not teach children God is dead |
Teach school children God is dead |
Supports ID? |