Skip to comments.
N Korea Military Tactics In A War With US
Director Center for Korean Affairs (North Korean Think Tank) ^
| April 2003
| Han Ho Suk
Posted on 10/21/2005 7:56:29 AM PDT by robowombat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
How North Korea at least claims it sees a future war on the peninsula.
To: robowombat
One nuclear bomb can ruin your day.
2
posted on
10/21/2005 8:00:07 AM PDT
by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: robowombat
That was a good find!
The only and only weapon NK has to slow us from crushing them like the cockroaches that they are is the public aversion to all the civilian deaths they could and would cause in South Korea. The en masse conscript tactics used by commies are not enough to even slow us down, not to mention that we own the sea and sky, we can strike them when and where we want as often as we like
3
posted on
10/21/2005 8:01:37 AM PDT
by
vrwc0915
To: robowombat
Yeah Kim, sure. Go ahead and try. Wanna see our retalion?
4
posted on
10/21/2005 8:02:14 AM PDT
by
RockinRight
(I am beginning to think conservatism is buried somewhere under New Orleans' mud...)
To: robowombat
"Nuclear weapons are offensive weapons and there is no defense against nuclear attacks"
I guess this ignorant statement is what passes for DPRK intel.
5
posted on
10/21/2005 8:05:35 AM PDT
by
oldleft
To: robowombat
We have, what, all of 30,000 troops there? They commies won't be fighting us, they'll be fighting the ROK with naval and air support from the US.
And they will be in a world of hurt. The forces they will be facing are qualitatively far more powerful that ones than anihilated the North Korean forces in the unfinished Korean War. Only Communist Chinese intervention saved their butts, and, hopefully, we won't have to worry about this, this time around.
6
posted on
10/21/2005 8:06:15 AM PDT
by
Little Ray
(I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
To: robowombat
What rubish. Posturing, posturing.
7
posted on
10/21/2005 8:08:19 AM PDT
by
brivette
To: robowombat
In June 1998, another submarine got caught in fishing nets at Sokcho and its crew killed themselves. Such is the fighting spirit of North Korean soldiers. Does anyone else find this to be a "strange" statement??
To: brivette
I am so ronery
![](http://img.slate.msn.com/media/39/041014_teamAmerica.jpg)
9
posted on
10/21/2005 8:12:45 AM PDT
by
vrwc0915
To: brivette
This is what they plan on fighting off the USAF with:
10
posted on
10/21/2005 8:13:51 AM PDT
by
oldleft
To: robowombat
"On the other hand, the US army was defeated by ill-equipped foes in Korea and Vietnam." We never lost a single battle in VN. The media and lefty protesters along with gutless pols cost us that war.
To: robowombat
I wouldn't worry as far as conventional warfare is concerned. The armoured/infantry units is sitting ducks for the USAF, and the NKAF and naval "fleet" is useless against the US. But nobody want's a ground war in NK. With 4 million fanatic soldiers it will be a bloodbath anyway you put it. What worries me is NK's nuclear capability. That country is a mad-house. The sooner somebody stops kill Kim Jong Il the better.
12
posted on
10/21/2005 8:14:32 AM PDT
by
Kurt_Hectic
(Trust only what you see, not what you hear)
To: robowombat
1 US SSBN, 15 minutes.
13
posted on
10/21/2005 8:15:24 AM PDT
by
ASA Vet
(Line the border with trebuchets.)
To: robowombat
Riddled with misinformation. The author states that NK has ICBMs with nuclear capabilities. Complete crap. To be effective against the US an ICBM must be launchable without notice. NK's unreliable Topo Dong family of missiles requires a liquid fueled stage, which requires loading. We know where the Topo's are and will destroy the facilities and any missiles on the pads.
The NKs best shot will be an opening arty barrage of chemical weapons, if they dare. This will be regime suicide, as it will immediately drag the ROK forces in to the fight. The vaunted NK arty emplacements have not moved in 20 years. They might be in caves, but they are vulnerable to air strikes and counter-battery fire.
The NK forces will be decimated if they leave their garrisons and cross the DMZ. Their is little manuever room in the ROK, so they will be wiped out by air power. Would such a war be bloody? Oh yeah, like WWII in Europe compressed into a 30 day time frame. The intensity would be unbelievable, but the outcome would be swift. The NK regime would collapse quickly and many troops, having spent years being starved and brain washed, would desert once they cross ed the DMZ.
Any war on the Korean peninsula will be sobering, but I would expect the ROK army to be able to handle the NK army with our support from the air. Remember, NK is working with weapons and systems that are old, Soviet derivatives. Other than popping off a few random Hiroshima-sized nukes, they've got little to work with. Besides, Kim is a survivor. He's not interested in upsetting his pampered lifestyle.
14
posted on
10/21/2005 8:17:49 AM PDT
by
usafsk
((Know what you're talking about before you dance the QWERTY waltz))
To: ASA Vet
You way is quicker LOL!
But my Marines would like the chance to say hello again, plus there is no finer way to say I love you to a commie than the bayonet
15
posted on
10/21/2005 8:18:42 AM PDT
by
vrwc0915
To: BlueLancer
By Han Ho SukPlease, this is a family forum.
(Welcome back!)
16
posted on
10/21/2005 8:20:03 AM PDT
by
dighton
To: usafsk
This will be regime suicideThat's the key - is there any evidence that this regime is suicidal? This isn't Al Qaeda after all.
17
posted on
10/21/2005 8:21:11 AM PDT
by
va4me
("Government isn't the solution to the problem, it is the problem" - Ronald Reagan)
To: robowombat
In June 1998, another submarine got caught in fishing nets at Sokcho and its crew killed themselves. Such is the fighting spirit of North Korean soldiers. Does anyone else find this to be a "strange" statement??
To: usafsk
The NK forces will be decimated if they leave their garrisons and cross the DMZ.I doubt we'd settle for 10%.
19
posted on
10/21/2005 8:25:21 AM PDT
by
ASA Vet
(Line the border with trebuchets.)
To: robowombat
whoa, should we be SCARED?
20
posted on
10/21/2005 8:25:29 AM PDT
by
NoClones
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson