1 posted on
10/21/2005 6:40:10 AM PDT by
bigsoxfan
To: bigsoxfan
To: bigsoxfan
There were two anti-gun ammendments. The first required all dealers to provide a gun lock with every handgun sold, and the second ordered the Attorney General to investigate if it was feasible to create a uniform test of ammunition for piercing body armor.
Not exactly a deal breaker, either one.
3 posted on
10/21/2005 6:45:41 AM PDT by
Yo-Yo
To: bigsoxfan
"Our concern is that, to finish the analogy, just like we now have to wear the seat belt or it's an offense," Pratt continued, "so, too, we would have to lock up our firearms or it would be some kind of crime, probably a felony."It is just a matter of time . . .
To: bigsoxfan; All
The gun lock amemdment is somewhat of a mute point. Every gun I have puchased in the last couple of years has ALREADY come with one included. The .357 Taurus I bought my sister-in-law has one integrated into the mechanism of the gun. Damn key lock was built in.
To: bigsoxfan
gee whiz, right after the Assault Weapon Ban sunset we do not get to use rifle bullets now? The NRA needs to have that changed.
17 posted on
10/21/2005 8:03:10 AM PDT by
JudgemAll
(Condemn me, make me naked and kill me, or be silent for ever on my gun ownership and law enforcement)
To: bigsoxfan
Why am I not suprised at the NRA supporting this kind of crap? I can't wait to start seeing this in fundraising letters. Too much good news out there on the 2nd amendment front. They can't gin up donations unless they have people scared.
18 posted on
10/21/2005 8:03:12 AM PDT by
zeugma
(Warning: Self-referential object does not reference itself.)
To: bigsoxfan
This bill is four steps forward and one step back. The trigger lock isn't that big of deal as long as I don't have to use them, and as long as the CPSC (consumer protection safety commission) isn't running the show on those. The other bad part increases penalties for AP ammo which is already illegal, and creates a wasteful study on them. We just need our guard up in 2 years when the study is complete.
I'll pay that price to ban junk lawsuits that can ban all guns through bankruptcy.
21 posted on
10/21/2005 8:15:05 AM PDT by
Dan from Michigan
("My Gov'nor don't got the answer")
To: bigsoxfan
>>>>"Our concern is that, to finish the analogy, just like we now have to wear the seat belt or it's an offense," Pratt continued, "so, too, we would have to lock up our firearms or it would be some kind of crime, probably a felony."
I have no problem with this. All of my guns are currently locked. A couple are also loaded. ;-)
patent
32 posted on
10/21/2005 9:44:59 AM PDT by
patent
(A baby is God's opinion that life should go on. Carl Sandburg)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson