To: quidnunc
He's on his own. He should have thought about who would cover his flank when the chips were down before he nominated Harriet Miers. What's the great poker player going to do now with all his chips in the pot and a busted 10-high flush?
79 posted on
10/20/2005 7:53:50 PM PDT by
thoughtomator
("Stare decisis" means every bad decision a court ever made is perpetually binding)
To: thoughtomator
He's on his own. He should have thought about who would cover his flank when the chips were down before he nominated Harriet Miers. What's the great poker player going to do now with all his chips in the pot and a busted 10-high flush? I'd hate to be in a foxhole next to you.
102 posted on
10/20/2005 8:01:39 PM PDT by
sinkspur
(If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
To: thoughtomator
No one ever counted on you to cover Bush's flank. Unless they were an idiot. We have always assumed you would be leading the enemy around to the back door.
To: thoughtomator
What's the great poker player going to do now with all his chips in the pot and a busted 10-high flush?Bluff on the river based on his earlier strengths and hands...
565 posted on
10/21/2005 6:21:17 AM PDT by
frogjerk
(LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson