[CyberAnt]

I agree .. But who's to say the charges being contemplated for "two" aren't for Joe and Valerie Wilson ..??

And .. Rove and Libby have stated several times - that Fitz has told them they are not the focus of the investigation. It's only the press who wants them to be the focus of the investigation.

The press has already admitted on TV that Fitz has not REVEALED ANYTHING .. so how do they know even this much.

And I loved this comment in the article: "None of the lawyers would speak on the record, citing the prosecutor's requests not to talk about the case." So the lawyers are talking even after the prosecutor told them not to. That's just great. Or .. maybe Fitz knew they would talk .. and he misinformed them of his intentions ..?? We can always hope.

[furquhart]

As I said elsewhere, the Times story makes it sound like they've both received Target Letters.

[muawiyah]

The Wilsons weren't called to testify were they?

Could that suggest that they are "targets"?

[gulf1609]

Does anyone know if the "whistle blower" protection law would cover Joe and Valerie in this case? I thought I read somewhere that a new special prosecutor would have to be appointed to go after them because in this case they would be protected.