Good post. Shows two things. Showing how the law allows for the human mind.
One could have said something in passing years ago...or sent an e-mail that they did not remember....
Later on in the trial..the person faces that or remembers it..... They were not misleading the first time...they just did not remember it.
FURTHERMORE..... INTENT. the word Knowingly. Good luck convicting on that one, Fitz.
Hm......
This appears to be coverup in case of no indictments.
The leak - possible serious legal trouble - means that the two are quilty of serious legal trouble whether they indict or not. If no indictments come down, the leak has already said they were guilty - so the republican prosecutor just decided to cover for them.
They are working on a win-win solution to this mess whether indictments are issued or not. How? By leaking that it was serious legal trouble for those two.