Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: billbears

billbears, I take no offense at you. I simply pity your need for the law to the exclusion of justice. I realize that the Declaration of Independence is not the Constitution, nor is it the Federalist papers, but it does address the very situation that you seem to promote:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government...

I am not a citizen of South Carolina, but I had every right to access it's courts and it's laws to defend my father's life - and to attempt to change them since they deprived him of life. I will do that very thing. My residency in another state means nothing when the state of South Carolina failed my father at every turn. The intent of our founders was that States Rights would be primary, but they recognized in the Declaration that destructive government needs to be changed. Holding destructive government responsible is the duty of each citizen, no matter where their residency is. You never know when you or someone you love will be transferred to South Carolina.


193 posted on 11/02/2005 6:54:08 PM PST by DadsGirl ("Come to Me all who are weary and heavy laden, and I will give you rest." Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]


To: DadsGirl
First off, indeed you did have every right to access South Carolina's court system for redress. As you were a family member I fully support that. If your mother would use those courts for the same purpose you should be able to respond. However, please understand. The Declaration of Independence was not intended to hold any legal basis. It was a document written for a specific purpose (secession from Great Britain), not meant to be used even 50 years later to forward our agendas.
198 posted on 11/02/2005 8:48:00 PM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson