Porn is insidious. It carries a message of an all welcoming invitation by a woman on a picture to have the watcher enjoy as a welcome and wonderful guest. This is why the Japanese and Europeans are not, so far, too damaged by porn, because they have strict guesthood practices which make people mature enough to deal with it without the perversions.
But porn is an unwanted arrogant guest in the house, and its effects on children are similar to pedophilia, and on adults to acceptance of homosexuality. So called homophobe men actualy liking men is a gross misinterpretation of consciousless crude psychologists. Fact of the matter is macho men who like to watch porn have simultaneously their own psychological boundary making abilities destroyed and are not macho anymore. It has nothing to do with homosexuality, but about "opening a door in the heart" to the world.
Only when opening the door to Christ as a guest in one's heart and house through consciousness of Him can the honored Guest have a truly positive effect at chasing away what offends Him and His patient. Psychologists raise consciousness in others as gods without a consciousness themselves of their own sins and how it affects their judgments on people. Counseling is part of an arrogant dark church of false prophets.
WE HAVE TO BE VERY WARY of what Time Mag people are coming from, because women and their privacy is in fact the main tool of promoting women's perversions and beating down on men with yet another unwanted guest in their house, namely a prosecutor/satan. Many people who have boundary problems let the state/satan get into their lives to get things "fixed". This leads to micromanagement and abuses against free speech. Women uncovering themselves make themselves offending and unwanted guests. If banning those books, then why don't women start covering themselves up?Hypocrisy?Feminists are proponents of meat & perversion in RoevWade Privacy, accusing their audiences,taking their publicized home over for their own private perversions.