Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Author Hopes Book Will Dispel 'Harmless Fun' Myths About Porn
Agape Press ^ | 10/20/05 | Mary Rettig

Posted on 10/20/2005 4:56:55 PM PDT by wagglebee

A contributor to Time magazine says contemporary society has been misled into believing pornography is harmless entertainment. According to Pamela Paul, author of Pornified: How Pornography Is Transforming Our Lives, Our Relationships, and Our Families (Times Books, 2005), what was once hidden in dark alleys and seedy theaters is now being glorified and mainstreamed by today's "pornified" culture.

"There's an idea that pornography is cool and that it's perfectly normal for men to look at pornography -- that they are biologically programmed to want to look at pornography," Paul says.

And, she notes, women have been "a serious target of this message in that they are told pornography is a guy thing, and that it's not their right to complain."

In fact, Paul says, the mainstreaming of pornography has taught a generation of women to believe that porn is for the independent and liberated. But that idea could not be more wrong, she asserts, because in reality porn victimizes women, poisons men, and causes children to grow up too fast.

In her book, Pornified, Paul assembles a compilation of surveys and other research as well as anecdotal evidence of the problems porn causes. Of particular concern, she points out, are stories of young children and teens accessing pornography from school computers.

The Time magazine feature writer says it is "very disturbing" that researchers are not exactly sure how exposure to porn is going to affect children down the road. "But it's clear that kids develop sexually during adolescence," she adds, "and they learn what their sexual cues are -- what's exciting, what's appealing" to them.

"If kids are looking at hardcore pornography online and learning that this is what's normal and that this is what is supposed to be exciting and this is what they're supposed to aspire to, they're learning a very scary lesson," Paul says. And her own research indicates that the damage caused by youngsters' exposure to porn could be both extensive and long term.

In a survey the author conducted herself, the overwhelming majority of respondents cited a long list of negative effects from pornography use, including poor relationship skills and serious trust and loyalty issues. Responses also indicated that porn can lead to negative body image issues in women and can distract men from their partners, detract from their sexual skills, and damage their relationships.

Paul contends that pornography is obviously a poison and that it has unfortunately seeped into many people's everyday lives. She hopes her book will help dispel contemporary society's misconceptions that pornography is in any way normal, hip or harmless.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bookreview; internet; moralabsolutes; myth; nekidchicks; pamelapaul; porn; pornography
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: tongue-tied
Erm,
Torture (pain, blood). Scared the beeswax out of her.

As others have said, porn is protected under freedom of speech. Whatever two consenting adults do without me there, I don't care. But since every porn actress I've heard interviewed trips my "incest/molestation" radar, I DO have issues with it from a court jester POV (in other words, you take the emotional cripples and cripple them even more)

And, with porn, often it's like bringing in an uninvited party for the partner who may not be into it. It's infidelity in a more twisted manner. (IMHGLO)

Oh yeah,
In a bit of delicious revenge

There is now stuff being made by very straight women for very straight women. IOW, if guys here get all wiggy over beefcake and chests, they'd have cows and coronaries over what these girls are doin'...because it's created from a totally female POV.

Talk about 'TRUE' competition ;)

41 posted on 10/20/2005 6:50:58 PM PDT by najida (The internet is for kids grown up-- Where else could you have 10,000 imaginary friends?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: JudgemAll
That's right. Nazies were into porn.

Actually, the Nazis banned pornography in 1933.

42 posted on 10/20/2005 7:39:33 PM PDT by Senator Bedfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mikegi

"No, but I also wouldn't have sex with my wife with my mother, father, or sister in the same room, either."

You gotta point there. :O>

But would you tell your parents or your adult children that you like porn and watch it? I am just saying that if you do something that you don't want your kids to do, or to know that you do ....it's your guilty conscience telling you something. (I am not using the word "you" as meaning you personally.)


43 posted on 10/20/2005 8:20:07 PM PDT by Hound of the Baskervilles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Hound of the Baskervilles
But would you tell your parents or your adult children that you like porn and watch it? I am just saying that if you do something that you don't want your kids to do, or to know that you do ....it's your guilty conscience telling you something. (I am not using the word "you" as meaning you personally.)

I overheard a guy at the Honolulu airport trying to explain the porn his parents found when they visited his apartment. It was pretty funny. The guy was clearly embarrassed but brushed it off by saying, in effect, "hey, it's better than going out and picking up a disease from some random woman at bar".

Anyway, I think your strongest argument is to ask whether someone would want their son or daughter in porn. Stick with that and you'll win.

44 posted on 10/20/2005 8:39:51 PM PDT by mikegi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Hound of the Baskervilles
I am just saying that if you do something that you don't want your kids to do, or to know that you do ....it's your guilty conscience telling you something.

I like to drive a car and use power tools from time to time, but I don't want my kids doing those things. Do you suppose my conscience is telling me that cars and chainsaws are immoral?

45 posted on 10/20/2005 8:40:03 PM PDT by Senator Bedfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: najida
Wow. Okay, she had every right to be frightened then. Beyond just weird, that makes one wonder. Just curious has become total agreement. Sorry if I overstepped.

The tagline is indicative of my history (after reading it) and not related to this reply. Sorry, maybe someday I can stand up and be counted.
46 posted on 10/20/2005 8:42:24 PM PDT by tongue-tied (posting stuff that doesn't take a strong stand since 2003...better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; little jeremiah

You (wagglebee) might be right, but it's a pleasant
surprise to find a reporter for Time saying what she
has said.


47 posted on 10/20/2005 9:00:20 PM PDT by cycjec (doesn't teach or inspire or compel them to think things throughu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thompsonsjkc; odoso; animoveritas; mercygrace; Laissez-faire capitalist; bellevuesbest; ...

Moral Absolutes Ping.

Please read this article, and there's info on the thread. Porn is not harmless; it is malignant and ruins children when they are exposed to it. Ruins them.

Freepmail me if you want on/off this pinglist.

And for those who argue "Well, it's the parents' job to keep kids away from porn" - it's too late. Porn has been mainstreamed to the point where the only way to keep kids away from it is to lead a life of hermitude in the woods and homeschool, and not even visit the library. And what about all the kids whose parents aren't careful? Let them all go to hell in a handbasket?

Also, evidence from Antonious that porn is indeed NOT covered by the First Amendment.


48 posted on 10/20/2005 9:19:32 PM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manwiththehands
This "to use porn or not to use porn" question is stupid. Let me put it this way:

1. Ladies, how would you feel about your guy if he was getting off on porn?

I once went on a blind date with a woman for a cup of cofee at a nearby mall. As were were walking around, getting to know each other, we walked by a Victoria's Secret store, and she noticed my glancing at the storefront. She made this "tsk, tsk" sound, and began talking about the evils of porn. I asked her what her views were, and she stated flat out that "porn should be outlawed." My response was "really?" She said YES! And it needs to start with Playboy. I was surprised, as Playboy has never really seemed like a major player in the porn universe... She said that Playboy was evil, and Hefner was a tool of the devil, and that she would never be with a man who read it. So, being a smartass, my response was, "so I guess my having a subscription would count me out, huh?" She said that if I ever wanted to go out on another date, I'd have to cancel my subscription to Playboy. That was the last time I saw or spoke to her.

Mark

49 posted on 10/20/2005 9:34:50 PM PDT by MarkL (I didn't get to where I am today by worrying about what I'd feel like tomorrow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: JudgemAll

Interesting. Thanks.


50 posted on 10/21/2005 3:28:10 AM PDT by Killborn (Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: jla

Pornography is an idolatry of perversion where fantasy is the medium of infinitization.

Who is the prince of phantasms?


51 posted on 10/21/2005 3:33:30 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: najida

I recall reading somewhere (FR?!) about sex videos that end up with an ACTUAL murder at the end. (I was going to say "I guess that is about the height of perversion" - but quickly realized I'm probably wrong.)


52 posted on 10/21/2005 3:55:32 AM PDT by geopyg (I BELIEVE CONGRESSMAN WELDON! (Ever Vigilant, Never Fearful))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: geopyg

Snopes says snuff films haven't been proven to exist. My gut says otherwise.

OK, anyhow, last night, I remember that one of the men I dated during the last 5 years or so admitted watching ever escalating porn to the point he 'Had imagines burned in his brain so awful he would never get them out'.

Seems he clicked on one button too many, I guess.


53 posted on 10/21/2005 5:12:56 AM PDT by najida (The internet is for kids grown up-- Where else could you have 10,000 imaginary friends?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

She had her standards, I guess. But something else I've learned is that women have the same struggles, just in a different way. Men are visual creatures, women are emotional. Men can get off on images and pictures, but women get off on romance and romantic stories. It's the same thing, really. Just in a different way. Men can fantasize about another woman visually, women fantasize about another man by reading a romance novel. I think it's a double-standard in society that has not really been addressed yet.


54 posted on 10/21/2005 5:27:13 AM PDT by manwiththehands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: manwiththehands

I agree.

One of the wildfire industries on the net are Ebook sites devoted to romantica (erotica-soft porn-romance) primarily for women. They are making a mega bucks hand over fist (OK, so I know know which stock to buy this week). These sites are begging for writers and many, many of the established writers are now getting picked up by respected 'paper' publishing houses. Jaid Black, Emma Holly, Angela Knight are the first ones to come to mind who made the transistion.

I will say this...I've seen a radical, and I mean RADICAL change from the old bodice rippers of 10 years ago to the more, erm, descriptive stories out there now. Some of it good (less purple prose, more accurate to human behaviors) and some of it just just....I mean O MY GOD! EEEK!

The women love them...there are forums everywhere devoted to this genre'.

We actually had a long discussion comparing the differences between 'guy' and 'girl' writing/etc. And they are different in just about every way, from being way----I mean, WAY more accurate in how the female anatomy works, to hitting the nail on the head about what women want in bed (I was serious when I said men need to read these things!!)

But don't get me wrong, it ain't nuthin' like what men get off on....the emotions still are the primary focus of these stories. The guy is absolutely crazy in love with the heroine from almost the first page, and it's love/lust driven sex...and there is always a happily ever after ending.

Not that I'm an expert or anything ;)


55 posted on 10/21/2005 5:51:21 AM PDT by najida (The internet is for kids grown up-- Where else could you have 10,000 imaginary friends?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: najida
to hitting the nail on the head about what women want in bed (I was serious when I said men need to read these things!!)

Every time I have run into porn, one of the most shocking aspects of it is its completely (and apparently purposefully) inaccurate picture of female sexuality.

One huge factor in divorces is young women playing the part their boyfriends expect until they get married, then falling back into what is a natural way for them to behave. He still has all his porn expectations and she has no interest in being his porn star anymore.

56 posted on 10/21/2005 6:16:48 AM PDT by hopespringseternal (</i>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: najida

A similar thing happened to my first cousin. Her ex was so into porn, that regular sex with his wife would not turn him on.

He ended up cheating on her, and we are not 100% it wasn't with a man and a woman.

Porn, like everything else you let into your head, teaches thought patterns.


57 posted on 10/21/2005 6:45:56 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: hopespringseternal
One huge factor in divorces is young women playing the part their boyfriends expect until they get married, then falling back into what is a natural way for them to behave. He still has all his porn expectations and she has no interest in being his porn star anymore.

I agree 100%....women, some unknowingly, send the wrong message. Porn stars and their behaviors are about 180 from what a real woman needs and expects.

58 posted on 10/21/2005 8:22:39 AM PDT by najida (The internet is for kids grown up-- Where else could you have 10,000 imaginary friends?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
It has been well observed that such utterances are no essential part of any exposition of ideas, and are of such slight social value as a step to truth that any benefit that may be derived from them is clearly outweighed by the social interest in order and morality.

What did they used to call this? Common sense?

59 posted on 10/21/2005 9:56:28 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
there are thousands of men who live normal, functional lives.

They're unaffected? How do you know that? Did you ask their wives? Girlfriends? What would they say?

60 posted on 10/21/2005 9:57:46 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson