The problem is that we have no idea what she is. What if she decides cases by what she likes rather than by what the constitution says?
All along this discussion I have noted that many oppose her because they didn't know anything about her. Some say they know by what she's said. What did she say? She has said she will follow the constitution, as did all the other judges now on the bench. If all the judges have promised to do that, why are we now suffering from an activist court?
My point is, absent disqualification for cause, ie. murder, why are we any more critical of President Bush's choice because WE DON'T KNOW MUCH ABOUT HER? Why not give President Bush the benefit of the doubt as he deserves from us. I know, but what about Federal Spending, what about NCLB, what about this or that? What about it? It has nothing to do with the President's sole selection of a Supreme Cout justice.