Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: libstripper

Just recently Ginsberg was asked to recuse herself from an ACLU case because she was/is an active member in that group. She didn't recuse. I think there is wiggle room for judges in recusal from cases.


62 posted on 10/20/2005 12:37:44 PM PDT by conservative blonde (Conservative Blonde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: Impeach98

ping


65 posted on 10/20/2005 12:40:19 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite ( Mike Pence for President!!! http://acuf.org/issues/issue34/050415pol.asp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: conservative blonde

There definitely is. The wiggle room only shrinks to almost nothing when the case in question is one on which the judge gave advice as a government attorney; recusal is close to mandatory there. If the case simply involves an organization the judge was a member of, then it's much more within the judge's discretion. The problem with Miers is that she may have directly given advice to President Bush on the policy being disputed in a number of cases that come before her.


69 posted on 10/20/2005 12:46:28 PM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson