What a stupid statement by you. Have you never criticized a president? What about Clinton? Carter? Were you not entitled to voice criticism, because you yourself had not "run for POTUS"? Only in a dictatorship are people not allowed to comment on what political leaders are doing. In a free society, criticism of the president is allowed, even by people who haven't run for president.
You may not like it, but its a careful and well reasoned remark. You act as though this is the first post I've made on the subject matter. Well, it isn't.
Kristol has been out there opining since he first heard that Bush`s pick was Miers. Along with other so-called conservative pundits, Kristol's endless criticism of both Bush and Miers has reached the point of serving no good purpose. They're now just senseless attacks that only give the Demlibrats ammo to shoot the the Prez and his nominee. In fact, it undermines the process and shows a total lack of resepct for the President's decision. Bush has a good track record of nominating/appointing solid conservatives to the federal courts. At this point, why not give Bush and Miers the benefit of the doubt, and allow Miers her opportunity to speak out in the Senate hearings.