Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Politicalmom

"They can CERTAINLY be accommodated. The child can be sent on an errand, or sent to the library, or sent to the computer area when/if homosexuality is brought up. Nobody is being asked to "ban" anything. They want their child removed, and this is absolutely lawful."


The problem with that argument is that state law allows them to opt out of sex ed (as I understand it , I could be wrong).

This is diversity training. But again, I would favor simply eliminating diversity training from the curriculum.


91 posted on 10/20/2005 10:46:47 AM PDT by gondramB (Conservatism is a positive doctrine. Reactionaryism is a negative doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: gondramB

This is covered under the Hatch amendment.


156 posted on 10/20/2005 2:31:33 PM PDT by Politicalmom (Must I use a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

To: gondramB
You are wrong, yes. Go to www.article8.org, where you will find that very answer, as told to the superintendent. The law in MA most certainly allow for parents to opt out of discussions and teaching materials. Which is what Ash was told, he however, is taking the matter into his own hands, against the law.
159 posted on 10/20/2005 4:03:40 PM PDT by gidget7 (Get GLSEN out of our schools!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson