[Mojave]

The clear words of the constitution as amended by the 14th should have "settled" the matter, as they are still unrefutable: " --- No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States

The 7th Amendment never created any privileges or immunities for citizens of the United States relating to actions in state court. Don't be willfully and deliberately ignorant.

[faireturn]

The clear words of the constitution as amended by the 14th should have "settled" the matter, as they are still unrefutable: " --- No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States

The 7th Amendment never created any privileges or immunities for citizens of the United States relating to actions in state court.

The wording of the 7th says -- "in any Court of the United States"; it does not say "only". Comments about state courts are suppositions.

But then, what chance does a mountain of facts have in the face of deliberate and willful ignorance?

Indeed, could those who contend that those clear words of the 14th need some 'incorporation' to apply to our BOR's be termed deliberately and willfully ignorant?

Don't be willfully and deliberately ignorant.

Try reading the article below, as it seems you need to educate yourself about the 14th & 'incorporation'.

THE BILL OF RIGHTS AND THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT http://www.saf.org/LawReviews/Amar1.html