I will nominate you for your conservative drama queen antics, hereby named the "jellybean"(due to President Reagan's fondness of that candy).
Your competitors for the "jellybean" for 2005 are robert bork, george will, bill kristol, michelle malkin, phyllis schafley, cal thomas, david frum, ann coulter, paul weyrich, pat buchanan, and bob barr.
I support Bush. I am disappointed but support this nomination.
Bush's prior record on judicial nominations is not merely good. It is outstanding. So I wonder ... Why would he nominate a clearly mediocre Meirs?
I'll speculate: Bush's team reasons that Stevens is 85 and unlikely to make it to the end of Bush's term. How does that change the calculus of this whole controversy? I'll speculate again: Appoint Harrient Meirs, who Bush knows will be a reliable conservative vote; and husband political capital for what will be the greatest political battle of the last quarter-century.
The point is that there may be issues about which we are not fully aware that are having a practical and immediate impact on Bush's decision-making.
I nominate you for using the most overused and trite expression (i.e. "drama queen") in an feeble attempt to intimidate anyone who does not wear a "I Heart Miers!" T-shirt.
I have never seen that expression overused so much as it has been during the last 3 weeks of the Miers fiasco. It really is pathetic.
But just to make you feel better, here is "Miers Card" for you:
"You are the greatest poster ever, and deserving of great respect!! Cool! Free Republic is blessed! You are the greatest!!!"