Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
"Look at the acrimony and insults on this board. Those are the voices of the GOP lashing out against conservatives."

HUH? I've watched the same "voices" you have on this board. Those voices of conservatism who line up with PEG don't represent me.

6 posted on 10/19/2005 10:03:02 PM PDT by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: A Citizen Reporter
HUH? I've watched the same "voices" you have on this board. Those voices of conservatism who line up with PEG don't represent me.

Exactly. My observation, cynical though it be, is that the GOP power base is miffed at those who object to the Miers nomination. The WH and the GOP have been insulting those who object to the nomination.

So, the GOP can adopt the label "conservatives," and I'll be content with being a far right, cynical, elitist, sexist religious bigot.

I apologize for misusing the label "conservative." I'm apt to lapse into misuse of the label sometime in the future, but that will just be an old habit dying hard.

13 posted on 10/19/2005 10:09:36 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: A Citizen Reporter

at least she didn't say that there's "too much God" this time.


219 posted on 10/20/2005 5:45:29 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: A Citizen Reporter
Those voices of conservatism who line up with PEG don't represent me.

The true conservatives here at FR call that type of thinking a "Bushbot" or "cheerleaer".

In Peggy Noonan's words, look what she wrote--it applies to your type of thinking:

They receive endless encomiums from friends and staff telling them of their brilliance, their courage, their foresight. "God sent you to lead us." And the authors of such statements aren't always or even usually sucking up. They mean it. They're excited, fervent, full of belief. All a president has to do to get a standing ovation is walk into a room. He signs his name to a placard at a rally and it's treated as a historic relic--"He touched it!"

This is why Peggy Noonan wrote this article: there are two camps of conservatives. 1] True conservatives, and 2] the words of Peggy Noonan above, or FR member words like "cheerleader".

Bush is splitting the conservative movement. The towel has been thown in by true conservatives since Bush has proved time andd time again that the label "conservative" was misplaced on George Bush. At the very best, he is a "moderate" in some areas. At worst, he has proven far, far left of leftists on fiscal matters and big government matters.

Peggy Noonan is correct. As is George Will. As is Michelle Malkin. As is Charles Krauthammer. As is tons of other nationally known true conservative commentators and true conservatves on this forum.

We all hated Bill Clinton and corruption and Marxism so much we ASSUMED George Bush would be a conservative. We ASSUMED all things George touched would turn to gold because Clinton was such a scumbag. We were wrong. Ronald Reagan was a conservative. George Herbert Walker Bush was a moderate. George W. Bush is NOT a conservative.

. . . but Peggy Noonan and George Will and Michelle Malkin and Charles Krauthammer and the hundreds of other national and regional conseervative commentators are! They are the voice of conservatism--George is no longer the voice of true American patriots who desire limited government, national sovereignty and fiscal sanity.

221 posted on 10/20/2005 5:59:13 AM PDT by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson