A second pot of info may still exist. Why was data destroyed? The witness said "I was told we couldn't keep this data more than 90 days because it contained info re: US persons." It was destroyed because Special Forces Command asked for that data and it was destroyed instead. That official now will also say that there was no ninety day requirement as was testified before the Senate Judicary Committee. On a regular basis, for months and months and months. He had discussions in DOD with Schiffren and said "don't worry about it." Contradictory to what DOD has been telling us. The ninety day period is not real. They kept data for months and months.
There is something wrong here... Watergate less than this. 3rd rate burglary. Nixon resigned. WE are talking about the deaths of 3,000 Americans. We are talking about 2.5 terror bytes of Al Quaeda data. We are talking about Atta and 3 of the terrorists who attacked us on 9-11. In January of 2006, who risked his entire career, he will swear he saw Atta's face every day in 2000 before 9-11. Who will command one of our destroyers in 2006 who agrees with Schaeffer. They all saw the same photographs.
THIS IS AN ATTEMPT TO PREVENT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FROM FINDING OUT ABOUT 9-11... YOU CAN'T LET A LT. COLONEL'S CAREER BE RUINED...
FV SAYS: Wow!
I didn't completely follow the part about them sending this stuff to Schaeffer. Can someone explain this to me? Also, they included 25 pens? ...was that supposed to be a joke or a threat?
Bttt.
Hey gal! Stunning isn't it! Now we know why Gorelick was really on the commission. She was there for one purpose - to hide Able Danger and excuse the Clinton admin from fault.
Bump for later read...