Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndyJackson

just a question if you have time...

Did Griswold outlaw use of contraceptives in the home or the sale of contraceptives? Maybe that's still too much for some but didn't the duly elected representatives vote that law into place? If the people's representatives voted for a law banning sale of contraceptives in CT, why is that bad--remember, this is supposedly how republican government works.

OTOH a law prohibiting their use in private home is effectively unenforceable


65 posted on 10/19/2005 3:57:03 PM PDT by Piers-the-Ploughman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: Piers-the-Ploughman
The state of CT outlawed the sale of contraceptives in CT. Griswold overturned that law as a right to privacy issue. The problem is that it was a bad law, and was also unenforced in CT until Griswold made an issue of it.

The problem is that most people try to attack Griswold by claiming there is no Constitutional right to privacy, which makes most people uncomfortable. The real issue is, even if you have a right to privacy, so what?

90 posted on 10/19/2005 4:29:01 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson