Check out post #30. It seems like though Specter initially retracted, he is now retracting his retraction.....
I think maybe my suggestion that everyone is running for cover and the truth may be hard to figure out is the most accurate.
But we shall see. At any rate, this isn't exactly going as planned.
Well, that just adds to Arlen's credibility, now, doesn't it? /s
And the fact remains, Ann didn't note either Specter's retraction OR his waffling on his retraction.
I still call that irresponsible on Ann's part.
I guess it could boil down to this: Whom are you more likely to believe -- Dan Coats, or the "ardently pro-choice" Arlen Specter?
Well, now I CAN agree with Specter afterall!