Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Im4LifeandLiberty
My guess is that they would feel that a) it was 6 months ago and the news cycle has moved on,

You know, if it were SIX MONTHS ago, I'd have to agree with you, but this was posted on the 17th, 2 days ago.

It's hardly the kind of information the FReepers would let lay around for 6 months before posting and discussing it.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1504277/posts

286 posted on 10/19/2005 9:26:23 PM PDT by Iowa Granny (I am not the sharpest pin in the cushion but I can draw blood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies ]


To: Iowa Granny

I was referencing the age of the story (published Sun., May 1), not the date of its last posting on FR.
There was a brief mention of it at the time (in the spring), and just a few posts-- one said something to the effect of "I hope it's not true," then a number of others outlined the logistical infeasibility of the alleged situation. It didn't get much attention, for some reason. It was discussed a bit more on other conservative forums, but was also quickly disproved.


296 posted on 10/19/2005 11:48:32 PM PDT by Im4LifeandLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson