Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Notice the comment that she wasn't picked because she's a female.
1 posted on 10/19/2005 9:11:42 AM PDT by Cautor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Stellar Dendrite; flashbunny; Cicero

Ping


2 posted on 10/19/2005 9:13:05 AM PDT by Cautor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cautor

The Republican National Committee is trying to get names to sign onto a pro-Miers letter.




This is just getting pathetic.


3 posted on 10/19/2005 9:33:45 AM PDT by trubluolyguy (I am conservative. That is NOT the same thing as Republican. Don't place party over ideology!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cautor

Make no mistake. We do not argue that Harriet Miers deserves a spot on the Supreme Court because she is female.




Other than the fact that Bush knows her AND she has female genitalia, why the hell else was she picked?


4 posted on 10/19/2005 9:35:30 AM PDT by trubluolyguy (I am conservative. That is NOT the same thing as Republican. Don't place party over ideology!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cautor

More and more, the intractable problems in our society have one answer: broad-based intolerance of unacceptable conditions and a commitment by many to fix the problems. This is why there must be an effective call to arms.


5 posted on 10/19/2005 9:38:00 AM PDT by Plutarch (Texasbar.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cautor

If only the administration would put this much energy into Social Security reform, the ownership society, and tax reform.


6 posted on 10/19/2005 9:41:11 AM PDT by x5452
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cautor

"We do not argue that Harriet Miers deserves a spot on the Supreme Court because she is female."

She doth protest a bit too much, don't you think?


9 posted on 10/19/2005 9:53:46 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cautor

If we had a MSM that was worth anything they would be going after those 14 cowards who produced this "stealth only" candidate environment.

Blame the spineless republicans for creating this political reality.

If they don't want this to happen again they better bulldoze the country club.


11 posted on 10/19/2005 10:12:24 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cautor
What I find alarming, is that on every indicator of character and loyalty revealed to date; some of which include her religion, education, employment and politics; Miers clearly demonstrates someone with a history of switching sides for personal gain.

This nomination reflects a reward for services rendered, not an elevation of a True Defender of the Constitution.
13 posted on 10/19/2005 10:50:56 AM PDT by FreedomFarmer (An assault rifle is used for ilk hunting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cautor
We do argue that being female has led her to have experiences and insights that add to her qualifications to serve on the Court.

Can we ask the RNC to elaborate? I would like details of these experiences and insights.

18 posted on 10/19/2005 1:25:49 PM PDT by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson