Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Behe backs off 'mechanisms' [Cross exam in Dover Evolution trial, 19 October]
York Daily Record [Penna] ^ | 19 October 2005 | LAURI LEBO

Posted on 10/19/2005 5:10:52 AM PDT by PatrickHenry

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 501-514 next last
As before, try to keep all of today's news in this one daily thread.

I hadn't realized it, but the Discovery Institute is blogging the trial. Their site is unresponsive as I post this. That's where you go if you want to see the ID-creationists' side of things.

Wikipedia has an article which grows every day: Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District.

1 posted on 10/19/2005 5:10:53 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
EvolutionPing
A pro-evolution science list with over 310 names.
See the list's explanation at my freeper homepage.
Then FReepmail to be added or dropped.
See what's new in The List-O-Links.

2 posted on 10/19/2005 5:12:29 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (No response to trolls, retards, or lunatics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
evolution = science
intelligent design = philosophy/religion
3 posted on 10/19/2005 5:33:14 AM PDT by thejokker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Behe had said under direct testimony that a creationist doesn't need any physical evidence to understand life's origins.

Well, you wouldn't want facts or data to stand in the way of one's beliefs.

4 posted on 10/19/2005 5:35:35 AM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Wow, his own university disowned his work. I didn't know that.


5 posted on 10/19/2005 5:41:57 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

placemarker


6 posted on 10/19/2005 5:47:41 AM PDT by King Prout ("La LAAAA La la la la... oh [bleep!] Gargamel has a FLAMETHROWEEEEEAAAAAAARRRRRGH!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

I think the only thing the defense needs to do is to establish the fact that broaching the subject of ID [which is all Dover did] serves a secular purpose via the Lemon Law. Which, insofar as ID representing just an alternative to the received wisdom of Darwin, does. If ID supplanted Darwin, it would be a different issue.

The problem for the plaintiffs [ACLU et al] is going to be in establishing ID as a religion or religious instruction. The only way they can do that is by mischaracterizing ID as religion, when all ID really is, is an attempt to use some garden variety tools of science [probability and information sciences for ex.] to see if design in biology is real, in the sense that it is indicative of a prior intelligence; or, whether design just apparent in the sense that things only appear to be designed.

Look for the ACLU lawyers to try and get Behe to mention GOD as much as possible.

It’s all they have, really. And if the defense can keep ID from being mischaracterized as warmed-over biblical creationism, then ID is going to be immune from ‘the establishment argument’ and the issue will be decided on the local level by local school boards…where such issues should always be decided.

Omar.


7 posted on 10/19/2005 5:49:31 AM PDT by bzrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

I bet it's tough to teach a science when you can't identify its mechanisms...


8 posted on 10/19/2005 5:51:22 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

We can teach students homosexuality is perfectly normal but we can't let them know that maybe Darwin was wrong. Sex education is good - ID is bad. I am so thankful my children are out of school now. For all of those who homeschool, know you are doing the right thing.


9 posted on 10/19/2005 5:52:35 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

No university is gonna go against Darwin just as very few scientists are willing to risk their funding by stating that maybe, just maybe Darwin is wrong. Thank goodness for homeschooling.


10 posted on 10/19/2005 5:54:04 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bzrd

And no matter how hard they try to stuff Darwinism down students' throats, the vast majority still won't buy it. I think all this grandstanding on both sides is a great waste of time and money. Most of us know God created the heavens and earth and all that is in them.


11 posted on 10/19/2005 5:56:07 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

Aside from Behe, the only person I see grandstanding in this thread so far is you..


12 posted on 10/19/2005 5:57:49 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852
We can teach students homosexuality is perfectly normal

And we are going to run out of oil by 2000 and global warming is going to destroy New Jersey, and the oil fires from Gulf War I are going to cause a global freezing etc.

And gender differences are not significant.

And that all life can be explained by random mutations and natural selection.

All that is good, accepted science-- at least OK for our public schools.

13 posted on 10/19/2005 6:00:35 AM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

And a pleasant good morning to you, too. Should be a fun day with this.


14 posted on 10/19/2005 6:01:31 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

Look at his publication track record before and after being granted tenure.


15 posted on 10/19/2005 6:04:29 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

I don't know about the grandstanding part, but yes, most of us know Who Created everything.

But that's actually irrelevant since science is not a democratic institution; but rather, one that follows the evidence regardless of where it leads.

At the End of the Day, that's the real issue here.

Omar.


16 posted on 10/19/2005 6:04:44 AM PDT by bzrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

And a very fine morning to you! Now that Tribune7 is here you can grandstand with the best of them. :)


17 posted on 10/19/2005 6:06:38 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bzrd

I thought the real issue was to make students believe that Darwin was right. But most students are bright enough to make their own decisions as to what to believe. Learn what will be on the test, then believe as they wish. You can lead a horse to water...


18 posted on 10/19/2005 6:08:44 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
Wow, his own university disowned his work.

Why are you surprised? The universities are populated and run by liberal professors who hate even the idea of God and who have a vested interest in promoting the idea of godless evolution over God centered intelligent design.

19 posted on 10/19/2005 6:14:49 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
...intelligent design does not propose ...

The quintessence of ID. (It lacks the other four, too.)

20 posted on 10/19/2005 6:29:58 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 501-514 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson