I hate these articles where reporters just try to throw a bunch of dust in the air, but there is some valid info to pick out of this piece. ~~~
To: flattorney
2 posted on
10/18/2005 11:54:59 PM PDT by
Mo1
To: All
To: flattorney
The headline of the story, it can't be an article because it's pure fantasy, is laughable. Earle is a demoncrat thug Hell bent on nailing any Republican he can. Here's hoping Earle takes one in the shorts for these bogus charges.
To: flattorney
If earle had done nothing wrong, why in his first public statements did he say the indictments were the product of a runaway grand jury?
It's the old "It's not my fault defense"
8 posted on
10/19/2005 7:08:18 AM PDT by
Jarhead1957
(Semper Fi)
To: flattorney
about as much evidence as earle had. what's good for the hammer is good for the the prosecuter.
9 posted on
10/19/2005 8:19:50 AM PDT by
jw777
To: flattorney
about as much evidence as earle had. what's good for the hammer is good for the the prosecuter.
10 posted on
10/19/2005 8:19:59 AM PDT by
jw777
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson