[Visiting Liberal]

Here's a puzzle for you, then. If the state only has the "power to kill and destroy," why exactly are we in Iraq at the moment? We seem to be engaged in a nation-building exercise using the tool least suited to the task - i.e., the state.

Now, as it stands I actually agree with you on some levels. However, I firmly believe we, in this country, have succeeded in creating the best possible state, as it's the first to be by, of, and for the people. The worst thing that could happen would be if that stopped being the case.

[Darksheare]

Let's give you a small ink blot test.
What do you see when you see this:

[MikefromOhio]

Here's a puzzle for you, then. If the state only has the "power to kill and destroy," why exactly are we in Iraq at the moment? We seem to be engaged in a nation-building exercise using the tool least suited to the task - i.e., the state.

Don't be a noob....noob.....

[MikefromOhio]

Hey Liberal...

Click on this link here....

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1103363/posts



And shove it. We don't WANT liberals here. This is a CONSERVATIVE site.

[Darksheare]

Saddam repeatedly violated the 1991 surrender agreement, repeatedly funded terrorism, repeatedly and systematically murdered his own people, and most certainly did have ties to AQ.
Saddam was forking out roughly 28,000 dollars to the families of Hamas homicide bombers.
Saddam also tried to assassinate G.H.W. Bush, but Saddams secret police were so completyel;y inept at their task that they got caught.
You see, they'd tried to put dynamite in the flower boxes on the building GHWB was in, but somebody saw the wires and dynamite bundles sticking out of the boxes and blew the whistle.

[MikefromOhio]

I see this in your future....

[baseball_fan]

I move the previous question. Can we get your take on the actual article?