To: fedupjohn
I've read on several threads that you can generally tell who is going to be indicted in a Grand Jury probe by who *isn't* called to testify. As I am not a prosecutor, I don't know how true that statement is.
If it is true, then to the best of my knowledge, there are two people who are centrally involved in this affair who have not been called to testify - Valerie Plame and Joe Wilson. That might be telling.
7 posted on
10/18/2005 12:35:34 PM PDT by
Terabitten
(God grant me the strength to live a life worthy of those who have gone before me.)
To: Terabitten
"I've read on several threads that you can generally tell who is going to be indicted in a Grand Jury probe by who *isn't* called to testify. ... If it is true, then to the best of my knowledge, there are two people who are centrally involved in this affair who have not been called to testify - Valerie Plame and Joe Wilson"I've suggested the same for the reason that "targets" get "target letters" advising them of their exposure. They rarely testify. Rove and Libby have testified a lot. Hence, they look like they should be out of the woods. As you note, Wilson and Plame have not and Wilson hasn't been grabbing facetime as appears to be his wont. In any event, I don't know what the h*ll is going to happen and neither does most of the reporters and speculators....
14 posted on
10/18/2005 12:48:56 PM PDT by
eureka!
(Hey Lefties: Only 3 and 1/4 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
To: Terabitten
If it is true, then to the best of my knowledge, there are two people who are centrally involved in this affair who have not been called to testify - Valerie Plame and Joe Wilson. That might be telling.I think Joe Wilson testified as late as last week.
23 posted on
10/18/2005 1:27:57 PM PDT by
fso301
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson