To: fedupjohn
"In another Article he was also asked not to divulge his testimony , as it was critical to the investigation. This does not look like someone that is a target of the SP, but a key witness."
I noticed that, too, and it does make it sound as if Rove's testimony was not the nail in the coffin for Rove but rather an essential piece for some OTHER line of inquiry to proceed.
To: Steve_Seattle
"In another Article he was also asked not to divulge his testimony , as it was critical to the investigation. This does not look like someone that is a target of the SP, but a key witness." I noticed that, too, and it does make it sound as if Rove's testimony was not the nail in the coffin for Rove but rather an essential piece for some OTHER line of inquiry to proceed.
DING DING DING DING We have a winner. Give that Freeper a cigar.
To: Steve_Seattle
Re#24 Yep. Indeed, none of the leaks are coming from the WH or Fitzgerald. This thing has a direction that the presstitutes simply refuse to acknowledge. Interesting too is that the NY Slimes and Miller are getting hammered by some of their peers. Perhaps eyes are opening, albeit reluctantly. Sure will be interesting to see what Fitzgerald comes out with, if anything...
37 posted on
10/18/2005 4:14:34 PM PDT by
eureka!
(Hey Lefties: Only 3 and 1/4 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson