How about a political motive, such as to accomodate a singificant religious group? t seems to me to be the real motive of the school board.
That would make a great argument for the defense. You should suggest it.
Really? You are in favor of "politically correct" lesson plans?
I just think it would be typical of this clown act if they argued they had the right to reprsent a significan religious group in the science classroom. That is, after all, the written policy of the Discovery Institute.
I noticed on another thread that DI has filed a brief in this case asking the court to consider the opinion of 85 DI approved scientists. That ought to go over well, considering that DI is on record opposing empiricism.