[WildHorseCrash]

He will take Miller's testimony as his brief and try to defend that position. My guess is that he will advance an argument like" Most people say you are wrong; why should we believe you?"

Doubtful. No one, except maybe a 1L, would ask that question. The attorney, if he's smart, will hammer away, with a set of yes-or-no questions pointing out every asinine statement and retraction that Behe's ever had. (It should be for a long cross...)

[RobbyS]

You are assuming that the lawyer possesses such a list.