Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Secret Code in Color Printers Lets Government Track You
EFF ^ | 17 Oct 05 | Seth Schoen

Posted on 10/18/2005 6:54:07 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat

Tiny Dots Show Where and When You Made Your Print

San Francisco - A research team led by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) recently broke the code behind tiny tracking dots that some color laser printers secretly hide in every document.

The U.S. Secret Service admitted that the tracking information is part of a deal struck with selected color laser printer manufacturers, ostensibly to identify counterfeiters. However, the nature of the private information encoded in each document was not previously known.

"We've found that the dots from at least one line of printers encode the date and time your document was printed, as well as the serial number of the printer," said EFF Staff Technologist Seth David Schoen.

You can see the dots on color prints from machines made by Xerox, Canon, and other manufacturers (for a list of the printers we investigated so far, see: http://www.eff.org/Privacy/printers/list.php). The dots are yellow, less than one millimeter in diameter, and are typically repeated over each page of a document. In order to see the pattern, you need a blue light, a magnifying glass, or a microscope (for instructions on how to see the dots, see: http://www.eff.org/Privacy/printers/docucolor/).

EFF and its partners began its project to break the printer code with the Xerox DocuColor line. Researchers Schoen, EFF intern Robert Lee, and volunteers Patrick Murphy and Joel Alwen compared dots from test pages sent in by EFF supporters, noting similarities and differences in their arrangement, and then found a simple way to read the pattern.

"So far, we've only broken the code for Xerox DocuColor printers," said Schoen. "But we believe that other models from other manufacturers include the same personally identifiable information in their tracking dots."

You can decode your own Xerox DocuColor prints using EFF's automated program at http://www.eff.org/Privacy/printers/docucolor/index.php#program.

Xerox previously admitted that it provided these tracking dots to the government, but indicated that only the Secret Service had the ability to read the code. The Secret Service maintains that it only uses the information for criminal counterfeit investigations. However, there are no laws to prevent the government from abusing this information.

"Underground democracy movements that produce political or religious pamphlets and flyers, like the Russian samizdat of the 1980s, will always need the anonymity of simple paper documents, but this technology makes it easier for governments to find dissenters," said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Lee Tien. "Even worse, it shows how the government and private industry make backroom deals to weaken our privacy by compromising everyday equipment like printers. The logical next question is: what other deals have been or are being made to ensure that our technology rats on us?"

EFF is still working on cracking the codes from other printers and we need the public's help. Find out how you can make your own test pages to be included in our research at http://www.eff.org/Privacy/printers/wp.php#testsheets.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: anonymousspeech; cnim; colorprinters; counterfeiting; eff; privacy; secretservice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-133 next last
To: antiRepublicrat

Don't worry! Once we get a Republican majority, this kind of of Orwellian big brother BS will come to an immediate stop!


61 posted on 10/18/2005 7:57:33 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
If you are not doing anything illegal, this should not bother you.

People with that attitude really scare me.

4th Amendment
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

5th Amendment
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.


Ignoring the 4th and 5th amendments to the constitution is disturbing. Your reaction is equally disturbing.
62 posted on 10/18/2005 7:58:08 AM PDT by Durus ("Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
Don't worry! Once we get a Republican majority, this kind of of Orwellian big brother BS will come to an immediate stop!

Thanks for my first laugh this morning.

63 posted on 10/18/2005 7:58:42 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: kpp_kpp
poke and peek

Are you showing your (technical) age?

It brought this old programmer memories of using the "POKE" and "PEEK" commands in BASIC to insert and read data into/from assembly-language routines (which could then be "CALLed" from BASIC...).

Ah, for the good ol' days -- when you could write your own applications -- on machines that came with a whole 16KB of RAM... (And yes, that is "sixteen KILO bytes"...)

OTOH, I don't miss the thrill of using a Radio Shack audio cassette tape recorder as my "disk drive" for program storage... '-)

64 posted on 10/18/2005 7:59:11 AM PDT by TXnMA (Iraq & Afghanistan: Bush's "Bug-Zappers"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: mysterio; antiRepublicrat
Once we get a Republican majority, this kind of of Orwellian big brother BS will come to an immediate stop!

Not only that, but the Departments of Educations, Energy, commerce, and a host of other wasted programs are going to be ended... I just can't wait for the Republicans to take control!

65 posted on 10/18/2005 8:00:53 AM PDT by pageonetoo (You'll spot their posts soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat; backhoe

Bump and self-ping for later archiving.


66 posted on 10/18/2005 8:02:33 AM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pageonetoo

Those liberals are sure gonna scream when we cut spending back to a bare minimum and get rid of stupid nanny government once and for all!


67 posted on 10/18/2005 8:04:23 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

I've heard the same kinds of comments used about the I-Pass system here in Illinois - the one where the electronic transmitters automatically subtract your tolls when you pass through.... and oh by the way, the gov't takes a picture of your car every time you pass through too. And let's not forget about some gov'ts already using this information against people in a court of law (like divorce cases where tracking the movements of one's spouse is "important").


68 posted on 10/18/2005 8:06:11 AM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

you caught me... BUT I WAS JUST A KID, honest.

my uncle introduced me to computers when he had a TRS80 w/audio tape storage. then proceed to teach me electronics, had me wiring up my own gate logic... provided a very good basis for my future in programming.


69 posted on 10/18/2005 8:07:28 AM PDT by kpp_kpp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

better check your meds.


70 posted on 10/18/2005 8:09:05 AM PDT by kpp_kpp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: kpp_kpp

Nope, it's gonna happen. Just gotta get that Republican majority!


71 posted on 10/18/2005 8:11:04 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: yoe
"If you are not doing anything illegal, this should not bother you.
Those printing money, drivers license, social security cards, false IDs etc. should worry a lot....."


Not really. Any real counterfeiter or forger would already know about this and have devised ways of disabling it.

Only amateurs will be caught. In the legal profession it will likely be used to time stamp documents from now on so anyone trying to pass off a document as older than it is will be caught and some political pamphleteers will be persecuted in countries without press freedoms. China, Tibet, etc.
72 posted on 10/18/2005 8:12:33 AM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
And how, exactly, does this differ from say—Vin numbers on cars, or lot numbers on foods and medication? It's the same thing. Ignored most of the time, but used as a forensics tool when a crime has been committed.

THEN they can trace the forged document back to where it was created and hopefully catch the terrorists or counterfeiters or illegal aliens before further crimes are committed.

I just don't see what the big deal is.

One other point. I tend to see many people who are deeply concerned with the borders and the number or illegal aliens in this country are also the ones who are most concerned about this kind of thing.

There is a certain irony to that. Tracking illegal document mills could really help us identify and return illegals. You can't take away all the tools away except for 500,000 people standing on the border and expect the problem to be solved. Besides, if you put 500,000 people on the border you'd hear screaming about the spendthrifts in Washington.
73 posted on 10/18/2005 8:12:52 AM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HKMk23
"...Every post is archived, time/date stamped and imminently searchable. Furthermore, the records that connect your screen name with your real I.D. are on file and can be subject to legal subpoena. "

That's true of nearly everything you do on the 'net, and everyone knows it. And the fact that the 'net is so insecure, doesn't mean we should simply roll over and swallow other threats to freedom as they happen.

So I'm not sure what your point was.
74 posted on 10/18/2005 8:13:46 AM PDT by LIConFem (A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz


does that make this a consititutional issue? is the gov and priv industry colluding to violate a right given in the constitution?

i hadn't thought about it in those terms before.


75 posted on 10/18/2005 8:14:12 AM PDT by kpp_kpp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: yoe
If you are not doing anything illegal, this should not bother you.

Trotting out an old favorite, eh?

76 posted on 10/18/2005 8:15:37 AM PDT by metesky (This land was your land, this land is MY land; I bought the rights from a town selectman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HKMk23
Furthermore, the records that connect your screen name with your real I.D. are on file and can be subject to legal subpoena.

That was scary for a while, but luckily it's gotten better. A poster in New Jersey was criticizing a politician, so the politician sued for slander, got a subpoena and went to get his name. The poster defended himself and recently won his case to not have his real name automatically revealed due to a subpoena. The politician must prove the slander suit would survive on its merits. He also has to convince the court that he's not going to pull a common tactic -- bring the suit to get the name, only to drop the suit once he has it, then take private retribution against the poster. This is the tactic used by the RIAA to find file sharers.

I also like that the decision cited the Federalist Papers in emphasizing the important nature of anonymous political speech.

77 posted on 10/18/2005 8:16:30 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: dead

"Seems to me that you could avoid registering the warranty and remain anonymous."
"Even the government can't be stupid enough to believe that counterfeiters are going to fill out the warranty card on their printers."

Printers high end enough to be used by counterfeiters don't have warranty cards. There aren't that many made. The manufacturers know where each one is.


78 posted on 10/18/2005 8:19:46 AM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: kpp_kpp
no, part of the point is they can match things printed by the same printer w/o any other information... thus using to contents of various printed items to help identify a person.

So?!

Go and buy a printer. Create your hate document. Dispose of the printer.

If you do not register your printer and only use it for one act, they will never find you.

79 posted on 10/18/2005 8:20:17 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (9-11 is your Peace Dividend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: pollyannaish
And how, exactly, does this differ from say—Vin numbers on cars, or lot numbers on foods and medication?

VINs identify actual cars, and tie them to their owner. The equivalent is if your printer gets stolen you can say it's yours when you find it. Lot numbers are for consumer safety, so the manufacturer can trace a bad product.

The one thing none of those others have in common is that they have nothing to do with freedom of anonymous speech.

I just don't see what the big deal is.

Because there are zero privacy protections in place.

80 posted on 10/18/2005 8:21:13 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson