To: wallcrawlr
Thank you for the ping wallcrawlr
This statement
"the definition of science and the boundaries of science should be left to scientists to debate."
That statement right there (especially the boundaries of science) is just one reason this needs to be in court.
Wolf
33 posted on
10/17/2005 9:08:32 PM PDT by
RunningWolf
(tag line limbo)
To: Brilliant
Touche... Brilliant!!
This statement
"the definition of science and the boundaries of science should be left to scientists to debate."
That statement right there (especially the boundaries of science) is just one reason this needs to be in court.
Wolf
35 posted on
10/17/2005 9:16:14 PM PDT by
RunningWolf
(tag line limbo)
To: RunningWolf
"the definition of science and the boundaries of science should be left to scientists to debate." That statement right there (especially the boundaries of science) is just one reason this needs to be in court.
Wolf
Lysenko would no doubt be very happy with this statement.
Coyote
37 posted on
10/17/2005 9:16:38 PM PDT by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson