Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WildTurkey
Bacon would not hold Behe in high esteem.

Actually, he probably would.

Again, when man contemplates nature working freely, he meets with different species of things, of animals, of plants, of minerals; whence he readily passes into the opinion that there are in nature certain primary forms which nature intends to educe, and that the remaining variety proceeds from hindrances and aberrations of nature in the fulfillment of her work, or from the collision of different species and the transplanting of one into another. To the first of these speculations we owe our primary qualities of the elements; to the other our occult properties and specific virtues; and both of them belong to those empty compendia of thought wherein the mind rests, and whereby it is diverted from more solid pursuits.

126 posted on 10/18/2005 4:26:31 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: Tribune7
Actually, he probably would.

Care to explain how? Anyone can cut and paste. Be a man. Of course, I have already shown you how you make absurb assumptions (philosophy=religion) when the basis for Bacon's life works was to separate philosophy from religion. Duh.

129 posted on 10/18/2005 4:32:44 PM PDT by WildTurkey (When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson