Once you let the SCOTUS make themselves the arbiters of what is covered by privacy and what is not, you've lost the battle. Griswold was an issue that should have been left to the state. The SCOTUS usurped the rights of the State of Connecticut, and it's been down hill ever since.
Well who is the arbiter then? The right to be secure in one's house, etc. is clearly a right in the constitution, and therefore affords some standard of privacy? If the SC is not to enforce this clause then who does enforce it? If the SC does not enforce this ammendment, what other ammendments do they not enforce? If none, then what is the function of the SC, in your opinion?