I just found an old thread about it...but, from the way I read it...
It sounds like it is more about the state having to PAY for, and provide the transportation so she can have one.
I don't think this ever was about whether she could have one...just how she would get there...since the state law says that they cannot pay to transport for that reason.
So, if the Supreme Court says "Yeah, she can get an abortion"...aren't we back at square one?
According to the article, she said that her family has borrowed money to pay for the abortion, but they can't afford the transportation.....which the state estimates if THEY pay it would be $350.00.
I will ping you to the site...if you would like.
Yes, I got that in the jist too - forgot to say so in my quick note.
Thanks for the offer of ping - I'm not up to getting into the case at this ime. It may pop up on my radar sometime in the future. I tend to go on an issues-driven basis, and collect a number of cases on the same subject, and I'm not up to doing that, with this. After all, it's just $$. I'm more concerned with saving the lives ;-(