[AmericaUnited]

Are you done taking the Gipper's picture down, since there actually is a right to privacy in the Constitution?

[JCEccles]

Yes, we all understand what the Griswold right to privacy is. Until liberal Supreme Court justices get a hold of it.

Then it becomes the hammer that the petty tyrants in black robes use to bash the Constitution into weird and ghastly liberal warps and folds. By heavens, they'll find a penumbra for a right to lurk in if they have to savagely BEAT one into existence!

Call me a cynice, but whenever I hear a nominee for the Supreme Court praise the "right to privacy," I see the reflection of a hammer in the nominee's beady little eye.