Replies

Well, I hate to back down so quickly... but it's important to admit mistakes.

I said she was a 100 lawyer, information I got from President Bush.

But in looking for a link to give you, I found that she was actually ranked one of the top 100 most influential lawyers.

To me that is different. Not enough to call the President a liar but it is enough to make the ranking less important in my opinion.

I'm sorry if my post was misleading.

http://archive.salon.com/politics/war_room/2005/10/04/toplawyers/

http://volokh.com/posts/1128789544.shtml

http://keyetv.com/topstories/topstories_story_281121428.html

59 posted on 10/17/2005 7:55:13 PM PDT by gondramB (Conservatism is a positive doctrine. Reactionaryism is a negative doctrine.)

"But in looking for a link to give you, I found that she was actually ranked one of the top 100 most influential lawyers. "

Even worse, apparently she was part of the 100 most influential because of being a Bush appointee, so it is a self referential statement.

Refreshing to see someone admit a mistake, you are a better man than me :)