[luckystarmom]

I guess I'm wrong. I always thought that Aslan, the Lion laying down his life for the young boy (Edward, Edmund??) was a great act of love.

Hmmmmm. I must be mistaken.

[DoctorRansom]

'Tis indeed Edmund!

But again, Atheists make themselves even more foolish than they already are (Psalm 14:1) when they attempt to tell Christians what is and isn't true Christianity. Liberal churchians and trilobites at the National Center for Science Education do this all the time: "Your religion is just too precious to be tainted with government assistance or public exposure in the court houses; you must keep it alive and sacred only in private!"

Shut UP! You run your religion, I'll let the Creator run mine, thank you.

"Go back to the Abyss!"

Dr. Ransom
FaithFusion.net
Independent-sighted, yet Right-minded

[Mr. Lucky]

Didn't someone famous, oh, I don't know maybe a rock star or a movie actor or maybe a writer of Satanic books for children, once say:

Greater love than this no man hath, that a man lay down his life for his friends.

[ConservativeDude]

The only way there could be love for these morons is if one of the characters was a cross-dresser or other perv....

[tom h]

"Pullman attacks Narnia film plans."

"I guess I'm wrong. I always thought that Aslan, the Lion laying down his life for [Edmund] was a great act of love."

Tsk, tsk, you just don't understand. ;) In the liberal mind, Aslan wouldn't lay down his life, but he would appeal to the Narnian equivalent of the UN, and the aggressors (e.g., the White Witch) would listen to reason and lay down their arms because the Secretary General of the UN (Geena Davis, dressed like a droid) asked them nicely.

You know, the same way that things work today with the Palestinians, Al Qaeda, Robert Mugabe, Muammar Kaddafi, the Chechen rebels, that butthole that runs Iran, and the communist Chinese.

[NTW64]

Doh!, did you just give up the ending?