Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cicero
For instance, one freeper said yesterday that she stayed safe in jail until an inquiry ended into the affair in which she leaked to Islamic terrorists the fact that Fitzgerald was about to raid their offices. I don't know if that's true, but it's one possibility. Another possibility is that it wasn't Libby she was shielding at all, but someone else. Who knows? In any case, she does not appear to have come out of this as a heroine to the left. They all hate her.

NOBODY likes a sneak. She went to jail rather than exonerate the Bush admin.? What was her angle? Is this really all for a book deal?

14 posted on 10/17/2005 2:09:27 PM PDT by podkane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: podkane

I honestly don't know. If you read that report about her and the NY Times from Editor & Publisher yesterday, you have to think that there's a lot of things going on that we just don't know about.

I think she put in all that jail time most likely because she feared that if she told the real truth about whatever she's hiding, she'd put in even more jail time, and if she lied she risked getting caught.

Another theory is that everyone at the Times hated her because of her MSM reports and because she had taken the government oath to keep any secrets she learned. Then maybe she thought she'd try to become a super leftist hero by going to jail to protect her sources. Only that hasn't worked. But who knows who she was protecting?

The whole thing is pretty murky at this point.


18 posted on 10/17/2005 2:16:10 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson