"To assume that simply because Mr. Johnson removed his child until he had such an agreement that he must be an abuser is equally demented."
I will defer to your superior judgement as to what is and isn't dementia, since it is no doubt gathered from long experience of living in that sorrowful state.
Gosh, is that the best you can do?
I've posted facts: hard data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics. The chance the Johnsons would harm their child is vanishingly small. Still, you desire to place them at the mercy of an unaccountable bureaucracy with a demonstrably failed track record of child abuse!
If you need so badly to hire an incompetent and corrupt police state to force people to live in the manner you would prefer, you are on the wrong forum.