Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie

The only thing that was said in this initial post was a denial of access. It never mentioned a court agreed to interviewer. It read that it was intended to deny any access. In fact the parents went in hiding with the child.


361 posted on 01/11/2006 11:37:49 PM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies ]


To: Raycpa
The only thing that was said in this initial post was a denial of access.

It was clarified further down the thread.

The parents were always willing to submit the child for independent third party examination. CPS wanted custody of Christopher in foster care before even beginning an examination and then only by their contract therapists.

IMO, the parents were absolutely right to hide the kids.

363 posted on 01/12/2006 5:32:14 AM PST by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson