Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fortunecookie
You would think that DCFS would be familiar with RAD

Since modern science isn't, why would you expect DCFS to be?

193 posted on 10/17/2005 7:11:11 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]


To: Rodney King
Well, I do believe that modern science is familiar with RAD. From 'emedicine' (scroll down),using the American Psychological Association's definition: Reactive attachment disorder Reactive attachment disorder (RAD), as defined by the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), requires etiologic factors, such as gross deprivation of care or successive multiple caregivers, for diagnosis.

And also from MedicinePlus:Reactive attachment disorder is a disturbance of social interaction caused by neglect of a child's basic physical and emotional needs, particularly during infancy.

It may be a relatively newly recognized phenomenon but it is nonetheless recognized and defined by medical groups. And medical groups are part of modern science.

204 posted on 10/17/2005 8:05:47 PM PDT by fortunecookie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson