All the energy and dark warnings indicating that the diagnosis is inherently associated with maltreatment.
Why do so many FReepers insist on assuming that their opponents in an article have some sort of evil intention?
Why do so many FReepers insist on assuming that the parent is a likely abuser when the accuser has never seen the child?
This is not a court of law, it is a message board. People can talk about cases all they want. All we have to go on is what little info is posted. What little info is posted points to quackery.
"Why do so many FReepers insist on assuming that the parent is a likely abuser when the accuser has never seen the child?"
"The wicked flee when no one pursues" -- Proverbs 28:1