To: Bernard Marx
What's wrong with considering whatever evidence Firestone has to offer?Nothing at all, but as a confirmed sceptic, I'm a fan of Occam's Razor.
73 posted on
10/17/2005 12:36:04 PM PDT by
headsonpikes
(The Liberal Party of Canada are not b*stards - b*stards have mothers!)
To: headsonpikes
Occam's shaves pretty closely, I agree. But I don't think it's 100% accurate. Nothing wrong with looking at new evidence IMO. It can be sent to the junk heap quickly if it doesn't prove up.
74 posted on
10/17/2005 1:16:30 PM PDT by
Bernard Marx
(Don't make the mistake of interpreting my Civility as Servility)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson