Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. nabs al-Qaida Web site producer (Good Article)
NBC News ^ | October 16 2005 | Ashraf al-Taie

Posted on 10/16/2005 4:32:26 PM PDT by jmc1969

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: Fetuslives
They keep reciting the same old "turning the corner" crap and "last throes" crap while simultaneously telling us that this is a 10 year war.

Victory in Iraq is when the Iraqis can take care of themselves and their new government.

But don't be a simplistic sap. We'll have support bases in Iraq for the next 20 years, just as we did and do have bases in Germany, England, and Japan.

61 posted on 10/17/2005 3:10:16 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
Isn't the efficacy of the process compromised by disclosre of its existence

First, with Abu Dijana out of commission there's really no one to keep updating the site. It would become clear to his site visitors pretty quickly that something had gone wrong. "Hiding" his capture wouldn't be very effective, IMO, and we don't really know when he was captured, so maybe word had already gone out among his site "members" that something was awry due to the lack of updates.

Second, the web server itself will be a treasure trove of intelligence information. It obviously contains all the usernames and passwords, and hopefully extensive web server logs showing the IP addresses of its users. Also, if the video and photo materials were emailed directly to the site, the source IP of those emails will show up as well. Gulp.

The users of this site need to know that their footprints have been uncovered, and that potentially all sites have been compromised and put them in the spotlight of military intelligence (Iraqi, American, Brit, etc.)

No, IP addresses don't necessarily point to a single individual, but they do bring the jihadis one step closer to exposure. There must be 4,000 very paranoid site "members" out there right now.

62 posted on 10/17/2005 3:42:23 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Bushisthegreatest
You stated nothing... "Now, since you guys are unable to defend your position against even the weakest resistance"

I suggest you continue to lurk and let everyone think your an idiot rather than typing a post thus proving you're an idiot.

63 posted on 10/17/2005 3:50:52 AM PDT by Toadman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wita

Yes, but I'll bet the imbecile is still lurking... so Viking Kittie Zot away!


64 posted on 10/17/2005 3:54:15 AM PDT by Toadman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth

The only attempt at fact presenting I saw from the Troll was that casualities are going up.

He she it cited a website that purports to show how everything is bad and wrong in Iraq because of casualities, now, as well as in the past. Then the Troll said we can't refute anything. Pardon me, who decided that the SOLE measurement of a War's success is casualities? That is plain stupid.

You can blow up people who are standing in line on a street corner. Horrible, horrible, horrible thing to do. You can kill Americans with a roadside bomb. Does that mean you are "winning"?

Only according to the MSM and the Teddy Kennedy types.

Talk about stuck on stupid.


65 posted on 10/17/2005 3:57:05 AM PDT by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Fetuslives
Oh right, we're "turning the corner" just like we were turning the corner the first six times.

Relative timetables:

WW2 timeline:
Japanese invade Pearl Harbor - December 7, 1941
D-day - June, 1944
VJ day - August, 1945
Berlin airlift - 1948
Berlin wall put up - August 13, 1961
Czechoslovakia invaded - 1968
Berlin wall falls - November 9, 1989-1990
US troops in Germany - 2004 - 75,603

Operation Iraqi Liberation timeline:
(aka Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Telic (UK), Operation Falconer(AUS)
Iraqi military - March 2003 - 389,000
Fedayeen Saddam - 44,000
Reserves - 650,000
Total Iraqi forces: 1,083,000
US troops enter Iraq - March 20, 2003
US forces - 105,000
UK forces - 45,000
Kurdish forces - 50,000
Other - 18,000
Total coalition forces - 218,000
US troops enter Baghdad - April 9, 2003
Saddam Hussein captured - December 14, 2003
US troops in Iraq - 2003 - 183,002
US troops in Iraq - 2004 - 130,000 Iraqi elections - January, 2005
Iraqi constitution - October, 2005

Number of attacks at election centers - 5
Ritter's statement, September 3, 1998 "Iraq could be only days or weeks away from having nuclear weapons if it acquires the needed plutonium or bomb-grade uranium on the black market or by other means." Ritter also said that, absent UNSCOM, Iraq could reconstruct its chemical and biological weapons programs in six months, as well as its missile program. He said that Iraq had a plan for achieving a missile breakout within six months of receiving the signal from Saddam Hussein.

66 posted on 10/17/2005 4:08:24 AM PDT by bIlluminati (If guns are outlawed, can we use tanks?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Bushisthegreatest

You want to talk job approval ratings? I suggest you try doing some research into approval ratings at this point of time in the second term of the last several presidents, all the way back to Carter. They are all lower than Bush's at this time.

Now for you my little troll. The thing that I find the most unacceptable in you is that good American soldiers are having to put THEIR lives on the line to defend your sorry assed carcass and your right to post your psychological failings.

Be gone idiot, and don't come back until you've at least reached your 16th birthday. Fool.


67 posted on 10/17/2005 5:25:30 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (Take the high road. You'll never have to meet a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Busisthegreatest; Darksheare; Dog; Peach

Icasualties.org??

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!!


68 posted on 10/17/2005 5:29:02 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (Take the high road. You'll never have to meet a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Fetuslives

It really isn't our fault if you are unable to understand the large picture and concept. My, the DUmmies are up early this morning.


69 posted on 10/17/2005 5:30:23 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (Take the high road. You'll never have to meet a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

Yes, 2000 casualties in Iraq proves we are not winning the war there, but 20,000 casualties at Trinian was just the opening bid to win World War II in the Pacific against Japan, and 10,000 at Normandy was the opening bid to win the War in Europe against Hilter.

As you say. Casualties don't prove one is going to win or lose. They are earnest money for buying the house of Freedom.


70 posted on 10/17/2005 5:53:45 AM PDT by patriciaruth (They are all Mike Spanns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth

*shrugs*

I was somewhat amused by the troll and his repeat statement of "Delete away!"
Like we aren't going to know who he is...

Wonder where and as what else he'll return?


71 posted on 10/17/2005 6:35:52 AM PDT by Darksheare (Cellphones, the Wholly Roamin' Empire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson