Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Quark2005

***it's the spiritual meaning of His words that have significance, not His endorsement of pre-medieval science***

Did Christ literally rise from the dead or was that "spiritual" to?


78 posted on 10/16/2005 3:23:57 PM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: PetroniusMaximus
"Did Christ literally rise from the dead or was that "spiritual" to?"

Christ did rise bodily from the dead. That is the one point in biblical text where there is no conflict between the spiritual and material histories. It is also the miracle that justifies the Christian faith, because it is a clear negation of the primacy of scientific reasoning in life.

It also does nothing to support a literal interpretation of the Book of Genesis.
81 posted on 10/16/2005 3:29:24 PM PDT by StJacques
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: PetroniusMaximus
Did Christ literally rise from the dead or was that "spiritual" to?

The crucial difference between this and a literal six-day Creation is that God has provided us with direct physical evidence that the latter is not a literal fact. The revelation that nature provides us is just important as what Scripture provides. Unless you believe that Satan is responsible for planting all the geological, cosmological, paleontological, morphological, biogeographical, and genetic evidence that contradicts the archaic creationist model of the universe.

If the story of a talking serpent and the two sacred trees in a secret garden isn't an obvious example of a Parable, I don't know what is.

100 posted on 10/16/2005 3:53:48 PM PDT by Quark2005 (Where's the science?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson