To: Matchett-PI
"Is that what you thought I posted?"
It's EXACTLY the message of the text you copied. Nobody can question obvious inconsistencies in the Bible because only the select *specialists* can ever know what the Bible really means. It sounds like Tom Cruise telling Matt Lauer that he (Lauer) didn't REALLY know the history of psychiatry, that only scientologists like Cruise truly understood. It's the same thing. Like Scientology though, Creationism is the emperor with no clothes.
So no, we won't shut up and let someone else dictate to us what the *truth* is when it flies in the face of the physical evidence.
313 posted on
10/16/2005 8:13:00 PM PDT by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
To: CarolinaGuitarman
"So no, we won't shut up and let someone else dictate to us what the *truth* is when it flies in the face of the physical evidence." If you want to save face with critical thinkers, you need to be specific and show us what particular "truth" you perceive that others are dictating to you that flies in the face of physical evidence. Pin it down exactly. Otherwise, you'll continue to just look foolish.
368 posted on
10/16/2005 10:14:16 PM PDT by
Matchett-PI
( "History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid." -- Dwight Eisenhower)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson