Madame, so that I may respond to your complaint, you will need to be specific. To wit:
[1]What was the ad hominem attack you're accusing me of making?
[2]what was the logical fallacy you're accusing me of making?
[3]what was the quote you're referencing?
That would be in this post to this thread: Interesting that the major propagandists for evolution tend to be atheistic story-tellers like Richard Dawkins or ‘political animals’ like fellow atheistic anthropologist Eugenie Scott
The validity of a scientific theory does not stand or fall on the one's theism, or lack thereof.
[2]what was the logical fallacy you're accusing me of making?
That's a two-fer: The ad hom, quoted above, and the idea, also noted above, giving rise to the notion that the validity of a scientific theory is in some way affected by someone's belief in a deity.
[3]what was the quote you're referencing?
It would be much easier to list the quotes you've posted that aren't distorted, out-of-context, or entirely fabricated.
By the way, I'm not a "madame" in any sense of the word. Just FYI.